✨ Try hovering over any cast and click to mint it
Klearu has been updated with new model support, enhanced specifically for it: transformer-driven image generation, with support for specialized text rendering. This brings our capability parity extremely close to current state of the art, and has a good amount of room on the table for improvement. Additionally, the desktop app is now in the repo, enabling use of various models together, with tool call support, animation, various forms of image generation, inpainting, use of reference images for more powerful alterations (similar to chatgpt images 2.0). https://github.com/quilibriumnetwork/klearu. Rather than simply note these things, I'm attaching a demonstration of the degree of capability change. This was produced witih the prompt "a digital brain with sparks spelling out the word 'KLEARU'". This will also be coming to quorum as a feature.
pro this, pro that, may i suggest being productive with the limited time you have on this planet?
A developer is facing more than 5 years in prison for building open source privacy software His name is Alexey Pertsev The precedent set in his case will reach far beyond crypto
February 2024 is when Merkle made the feed algo-only and eliminated the following feed that stayed in place until the alternate following feed option was brought back (over a year later) they threw out user following preferences and put their thumb on the scale for who should be popular for over a year wowow
the $glyphs token is based on aligning incentives among prompt creators, ppl glyphing, and investors each time a glyph is minted on the app, 20 cents of the 25 cent platform fee will go to buy back and burn the glyphs token on the open market, the remaining 5 cents will go to cover metadata storage costs more mints = more market buys/burns 50% of the total supply has been allocated to a glyphs creator rewards fund, of which we will be distributing 1% of the remaining creator rewards fund supply each month to ppl actively using the app: of that 1% monthly rewards, 69% will go to the top prompt creators based on total number of mints using their prompts, 30% will go to the top minters based on the total number of glyphs minted, and 1% will go to the top ppl creating glyphs regardless if minted or not our goal: 1. usage of the app drives value to the token, and 2. glyphs users benefit the most from the app's success 🌱
The more I work with the Farcaster code base the more convinced I am that that top reason was a bad spam model. This model marks most people, including me, spam while a select, mostly hand-picked, few are designated "high quality" and were boosted in the feed. The boosting of those select few contributed to the "cabal effect" that many users could sense on the timeline. Over the past week, I've replaced the use of the old spam label with the Neynar score in the home feed algos, bit by bit. As of today, home feed algos no longer use the spam label at all. Engagement and diversity of authorship in the home feed have grown as a clear result of swapping the model.